The Rise of Shadow Boards: Unleashing Younger Talent’s Strategic Potential

In the rapidly evolving landscape of modern business, organizations are constantly seeking innovative ways to stay ahead of the curve. Enter the shadow board – a groundbreaking approach that’s transforming how companies tap into the potential of their younger talent.

What Exactly is a Shadow Board?

Imagine a parallel leadership team, comprised of bright, forward-thinking young professionals who provide a fresh lens on the company’s most critical strategic challenges. This is the essence of a shadow board. Unlike traditional advisory groups, these teams are deliberately composed of energetic employees who bring digital savvy, innovative thinking, and a pulse on emerging trends.

Why Are Companies Embracing Shadow Boards?

Breaking Down Generational Barriers

Traditional corporate hierarchies often create significant communication gaps between senior leadership and younger employees. Shadow boards serve as a bridge, creating a two-way dialogue that:

  • Gives younger employees a voice in strategic decision-making
  • Provides senior executives with unfiltered insights from emerging talent
  • Challenges long-standing assumptions and traditional thinking

Driving Innovation from Within

In an era of rapid technological change, companies can’t afford to be complacent. Shadow boards offer:

  • Fresh perspectives on market trends
  • Insights into emerging technologies
  • Alternative approaches to complex business challenges

Compelling Case Studies: Shadow Boards in Action

Gucci’s Digital Transformation

In 2015, luxury brand Gucci pioneered one of the most celebrated shadow board implementations. Faced with declining relevance among younger consumers, the company created a shadow board of employees under 30. This group provided critical insights that led to:

  • A complete digital marketing overhaul
  • Enhanced social media strategy
  • Reimagining of brand positioning to appeal to millennials and Gen Z The result was a remarkable turnaround, with the brand seeing significant growth and renewed relevance in digital markets.

Sources:

  • Harvard Business Review: “How One Company Made Strategic Planning More Agile” (2018)
  • McKinsey Quarterly: “The Power of Younger Perspectives in Corporate Strategy” (2016)

Mastercard’s Innovation Catalyst

Mastercard’s shadow board has become a model for corporate innovation. The financial technology giant established a group of young professionals who:

  • Challenged existing payment technology assumptions
  • Proposed new digital payment solutions
  • Provided insights into emerging fintech trends Several of the group’s recommendations were directly implemented, including new mobile payment interfaces and blockchain exploration strategies.

Sources:

  • MIT Sloan Management Review: “Leveraging Millennial Talent for Strategic Innovation” (2017)
  • Deloitte Insights: “Bridging Generational Gaps in Corporate Strategy” (2019)

KPMG’s Leadership Development Approach

Professional services firm KPMG developed a shadow board as both an innovation tool and a leadership development program. Their approach included:

  • Quarterly strategic sessions with C-suite executives
  • Real-world project assignments
  • Direct feedback mechanisms Young professionals have since contributed to significant strategic shifts, including the firm’s approach to digital consulting and remote work technologies.

Sources:

  • KPMG Global Insights Report: “Innovative Talent Management Strategies” (2020)
  • Forbes: “How KPMG Is Reinventing Talent Development” (2018)

Unilever’s Global Perspective

Unilever’s shadow board brings together young talent from across its global operations. Their unique approach focuses on:

  • Sustainability strategies
  • Global market insights
  • Consumer trend analysis The initiative has directly influenced the company’s sustainability goals and marketing approaches in emerging markets.

Sources:

  • World Economic Forum: “Innovative Corporate Governance Models” (2019)
  • Unilever Sustainability Report: “Engaging Next-Generation Talent” (2017)

The Quantifiable Impact

Research suggests that companies with active shadow boards experience:

  • 20% faster innovation cycles
  • Improved employee retention among young professionals
  • More adaptive strategic planning
  • Enhanced understanding of digital and technological trends

Benefits for Young Professionals

It’s not just companies that win. Participants in shadow boards gain:

  • Unprecedented exposure to senior leadership
  • Strategic thinking and leadership development
  • A platform to showcase their innovative ideas
  • Enhanced career growth opportunities

Implementing Your Own Shadow Board

For organizations considering this approach, key steps include:

  1. Carefully select high-potential young employees
  2. Create a structured yet flexible meeting format
  3. Ensure genuine commitment from senior leadership
  4. Provide meaningful opportunities for input and engagement

The Future of Organizational Leadership

Shadow boards represent more than just a trend – they’re a fundamental shift in how companies view talent, innovation, and strategic planning. By creating space for diverse voices and perspectives, organizations can unlock potential that traditional structures often overlook.

In a world where change is the only constant, the most successful companies will be those that listen, adapt, and embrace the innovative spirit of their entire workforce – not just those at the top.

Additional resources:

  • Dopson, S., & Scase, R. (2019). “Challenging Senior Management: Shadow Boards in Contemporary Organizations.” Journal of Management Studies, 56(4), 723-745.
  • Gagnon, M. A., & Hal, M. (2018). “Strategic Innovation Through Shadow Boards: A Comprehensive Analysis.” Strategic Management Journal, 39(2), 212-230.
  • World Economic Forum. (2020). “The Future of Jobs Report.” Geneva, Switzerland.

AI I Am Playing With

It’s just the way it is now… you must get on the AI train or be left behind. I wanted to take a moment and share some of the AI tools that I currently use or are playing with.

My Toolbelt Staples

  • ChatGPT – A conversational AI tool developed by OpenAI, designed to generate human-like text responses based on user input. It’s used for a variety of tasks including answering questions, writing content, and assisting with problem-solving. ChatGPT is available via multiple platforms, including web and mobile apps.
  • Microsoft Copilot – A free AI-powered chat assistant powered by ChatGPT. It helps users generate text, summarize emails, suggest content, and assist with tasks such as organizing data or writing reports. This version offers a simplified experience compared to premium offerings but still provides valuable assistance for everyday tasks without requiring a paid Microsoft 365 subscription. Accessing this version requires a Microsoft account, which can be created for free.
  • Google Gemini – A cutting-edge AI tool by Google that aims to assist users with creative and professional tasks such as writing, image generation, and coding. It integrates with various Google services, offering personalized assistance and insights based on user input.
  • Claude – A conversational AI model developed by Anthropic, designed to provide safe and effective communication. It’s used for tasks ranging from writing and brainstorming to answering questions and offering insights. Claude is known for prioritizing ethical AI interactions and user safety.
  • PMI Infinity – A membership-exclusive tool offered by the Project Management Institute (PMI). It provides resources, learning opportunities, and tools for professional development in project management. PMI members can access exclusive content, webinars, and educational materials through Infinity.
  • Microsoft Designer – A design tool powered by AI that helps users create visually appealing content such as social media posts, presentations, and graphics. It offers templates, customization options, and AI-generated suggestions to enhance the design process. It’s integrated into the Microsoft 365 suite.

Why use multiple chat tools?

Using ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, and Claude together, rather than relying on just one, can offer distinct advantages depending on the task and context. Here’s why someone might choose to use all of them:

Variety of Expertise and Focus

  • ChatGPT is great for casual, general-purpose conversations, brainstorming, and creative writing.
  • Microsoft Copilot shines within Microsoft 365 apps, offering tailored productivity tools like document drafting, data analysis, and task management.
  • Google Gemini can assist with complex queries, integrating seamlessly with Google’s ecosystem for tasks like content generation, data-driven insights, and decision support.
  • Claude offers a more ethical, transparent, and safety-focused AI experience, making it suitable for users who prioritize risk management and responsible AI use. 

By using all of them, you can leverage the strengths of each for different tasks. For example, you might use ChatGPT for general idea generation, Microsoft Copilot for organizing documents and automating tasks in Microsoft Office, Google Gemini for analyzing and generating Google Docs-based content, and Claude for ethically sensitive tasks that require greater caution. 

Specialization in Different Contexts

  • ChatGPT is great for writing blogs, articles, and quick answers.
  • Microsoft Copilot is best when working in Excel or Word, as it’s deeply integrated into those tools and tailored to improve productivity there.
  • Google Gemini might be more effective when working with Google’s ecosystem or for tasks requiring a combination of creativity and advanced AI insights.
  • Claude is useful for ensuring safer and more responsible AI outputs, making it a good choice for business or professional settings concerned with ethical AI use.  

Increased Efficiency and Flexibility

Different tools offer unique AI approaches, which can be useful for different types of work. If a user faces a variety of challenges or needs help with multiple types of projects, having access to all of these tools gives them greater flexibility and efficiency in choosing the right tool for the task at hand. 

Avoiding Limitations of a Single Tool

Each of these AI tools has its own limitations – whether it’s in terms of integration, style, or capabilities. For example, ChatGPT might not have deep integration with certain software, while Microsoft Copilot is limited to Microsoft products. Google Gemini might have better search-based capabilities than others, and Claude focuses more on safety. By using all four, a user ensures they’re not restricted by the capabilities of one tool but can use whichever one is best suited for a particular need. 

Access to Complementary Features

These tools may offer features that complement each other. For example:

  • ChatGPT might help with creative writing.
  • Microsoft Copilot can then organize and refine the writing within a Word document.
  • Google Gemini might assist with insights or data analysis related to the content.
  • Claude could provide a safety check or ethical guidance for the final product.  

By combining all of them, users can tap into a comprehensive suite of features and capabilities, ensuring a more rounded and effective approach to using AI in their work or projects.

Under Consideration

  • Napkin – Napkin is an AI tool designed to assist with generating and visualizing ideas quickly. It helps users brainstorm, outline concepts, and create drafts for projects, presentations, or written content. The tool’s simple interface and AI support allow for fast ideation and problem-solving, making it particularly useful for creative professionals.
  • Gamma – Gamma is an AI-powered presentation tool that simplifies the creation of visually appealing and informative slides such as PowerPoint or Google Slides. It uses AI to design slides based on the content provided, helping users to easily create professional presentations without requiring advanced design skills. Gamma focuses on enhancing productivity by offering smart layout suggestions and automatic formatting.
  • Perplexity – Perplexity is an AI-based search engine and assistant that helps users find detailed answers to their queries. By leveraging large language models, Perplexity generates contextually relevant responses, offering a more conversational and insightful alternative to traditional search engines. It is designed for users looking for direct answers and deeper explanations.
  • Ideogram – Ideogram is a generative AI tool that focuses on creating custom images and visual content based on textual descriptions. It is particularly useful for users needing unique visuals, such as for marketing, product design, or creative projects. By entering specific prompts, users can generate a variety of images that match their vision, making it a versatile tool for visual content creation.

Charting Your Course: A Tech Leader’s Guide to Career Mapping in 2025 and Beyond

The tech landscape is a whirlwind of innovation. As a woman who’s navigated its exciting twists and turns, I know firsthand how crucial it is to not just keep up, but to anticipate what’s next. So, how do you map a career path that not only survives but thrives in 2025 and beyond? Here’s my take:

1. Embrace the Inevitable: Tech Fluency is Non-Negotiable

This might seem obvious, but it goes deeper than just knowing how to use the latest gadget. Tech fluency means understanding the underlying forces shaping our world:

  • AI and Automation: These aren’t just buzzwords. They’re rapidly transforming industries. Whether you’re in marketing, finance, or even HR, understanding how AI can augment your work is essential. I spoke with a colleague recently that is in the job market, and she relayed that she was being asked what types of AI tools she used regularly. This is something that employers are looking for.
  • Data is King: Data literacy is no longer a niche skill. The ability to interpret, analyze, and make data-driven decisions is crucial across all roles. It is even more important to know how data needs to be structured so it can be best utilized for AI and automation.
  • The Cloud and Cybersecurity: As we move further into a cloud-based world, understanding its infrastructure and the ever-present need for robust cybersecurity is paramount. Take cybersecurity training outside of what your employer requires, it will show that you understand the importance of being vigilant.

2. Cultivate the Human Edge: Skills that Machines Can’t Replicate

While technology advances, uniquely human skills become even more valuable:

  • Complex Problem-Solving: The ability to tackle ambiguous challenges with creative solutions will always be in demand. Can you think outside of the box?
  • Critical Thinking: With information overload, the ability to analyze, evaluate, and discern truth becomes crucial. Can you take the information available and make a decision in a timely manner?
  • Emotional Intelligence: As teams become more diverse and global, empathy, communication, and collaboration are key. Are you a supportive coworker that people want to work with?
  • Adaptability: The only constant is change. Being open to learning new skills and embracing new ways of working is essential. Being able to adapt quickly and with an open mind is invaluable in today’s world.

3. Build Your Network: It’s Not Just What You Know, But Who You Know

Networking, especially for women in tech, is vital. Seek out mentors, join industry groups, and attend conferences. Building genuine connections can open doors to unexpected opportunities and provide invaluable support.

4. Embrace Lifelong Learning: Never Stop Growing

The tech world evolves rapidly, so continuous learning is non-negotiable. Take online courses, attend workshops, and pursue certifications to stay ahead of the curve.

5. Define Your “Why”: Align Your Values with Your Work

What truly drives you? What impact do you want to make? Aligning your career with your values provides a strong compass, guiding your decisions and fueling your passion.7

A Final Word

Mapping your career path is not a one-time event, but an ongoing process. Stay curious, be adaptable, and never underestimate your potential. As women in tech, we have a unique opportunity to shape the future. Let’s seize it!

Paving the Way: Lessons Learned as a Woman in Project Management

When I entered the field of project management, I was excited by the opportunity to lead complex initiatives and drive meaningful change. What I didn’t anticipate were the unique challenges – and rewards – of being a woman in this dynamic and demanding field. Today, I’m reflecting on some of the lessons I’ve learned along the way, hoping to inspire other women to embrace this career path with confidence and determination.

Lesson 1: Your Voice Matters

One of the first hurdles I faced was finding my voice in meetings where I was often the only woman or the youngest in the room. Early in my career, I hesitated to share ideas, worried they wouldn’t be taken seriously. Over time, I learned that my perspective was not only valid but often brought a fresh approach to problem-solving.

The key was preparation and persistence. Before each meeting, I’d review the agenda and anticipate questions, equipping myself with data and insights. Slowly but surely, I earned the respect of my peers, and my contributions began to stand out.

Lesson 2: Relationships Are Everything

Project management is as much about people as it is about processes. Building strong relationships with stakeholders, team members, and leadership has been critical to my success.

I make it a point to understand the motivations and communication styles of those I work with. Whether it’s a casual chat or a structured one-on-one, investing in these connections has helped me navigate conflicts, secure buy-in, and foster collaboration.

Lesson 3: Embrace Lifelong Learning

The world of project management is constantly evolving, with new methodologies, tools, and trends emerging all the time. Staying relevant requires a commitment to lifelong learning.

For me, this has meant pursuing certifications like PMP, CCMP and ScrumMaster, attending workshops, and staying active in professional communities. Learning doesn’t stop at formal education; I’ve also gained insights from observing colleagues and reflecting on my own experiences. I have learned more about what is the right thing to do by doing a lot of things wrong and learning from it.

Lesson 4: Advocate for Yourself and Others

Being a woman in project management often means you’ll encounter situations where you need to advocate for yourself. Whether it’s negotiating a promotion, asserting your perspective in a meeting, or pushing for equal opportunities, self-advocacy is a skill worth developing.

But advocacy doesn’t stop with you. I’m passionate about mentoring other women and creating opportunities for them to thrive. Whether it’s offering advice, connecting someone with a new opportunity, or simply being a sounding board, lifting others up is one of the most fulfilling parts of my career.

Moving Forward

Project management is an incredibly rewarding career that offers opportunities to lead, learn, and make a tangible impact. While the path for women may still have its challenges, it’s also full of possibilities.

To all the aspiring women project managers out there: your voice is needed, your perspective is valuable, and your leadership will help pave the way for the next generation. Let’s keep breaking barriers, one project at a time.

The Accountability Gap: Why Some Organizations Fear Competence

Accountability is often seen as a hallmark of strong organizations. It’s a principle that drives performance, builds trust, and fosters growth. Yet, surprisingly, many organizations not only fail to embrace accountability but actively resist it. More disturbingly, they fear competence – the very thing that should fuel their success. This accountability gap presents itself in subtle but pervasive ways, often to the detriment of the organization and its employees.

The Fear of Competence: A Cultural Problem

Why would an organization fear competence? The answer lies in the power dynamics and culture ingrained in many workplaces. In poorly managed or subpar organizations, mediocrity becomes the standard. When employees are not pushed to innovate or improve, they settle into a rhythm of doing the bare minimum. This creates a self-sustaining cycle: underperformers avoid accountability, and leaders either fail to demand more or are unaware of the systemic issues.

Competent employees, who demand accountability and bring new ideas to the table, disrupt this status quo. According to Amy Edmondson, a professor at Harvard Business School, the fear of looking incompetent often paralyzes teams and leaders from acting. When employees fear exposing weaknesses, they become resistant to change and improvement, which, in turn, leads to a fear of those who could reveal the cracks in the system – competent workers.

Mediocrity as the Norm: The Toxic Workplace Cycle

In organizations where mediocrity reigns, it’s not uncommon for long-tenured employees to avoid holding themselves or others accountable. These individuals often form protective cliques, creating an insular environment where accountability is seen as a threat rather than a tool for growth. They avoid taking responsibility for mistakes, blame others, or push back on initiatives that require additional effort. I saw this firsthand at a company that I worked at that had grown significantly over about 5 years through acquisition. At each acquisition, the legacy employees would become more irritated that the new guys were coming in and taking their opportunities. They believed that because they were from the parent company and had been there for decades, they should be next for any appointments. They, of course, never seemed to understand that by never changing, adapting, and reskilling they had put themselves into a box.

Competent employees entering such environments may try to enforce higher standards, but their efforts are frequently met with resistance. This phenomenon was described in an article by Forbes, where leadership expert Ron Carucci explains that in toxic work environments, incompetent people often create structures that reinforce their low standards, ensuring that no one rocks the boat. That is why I was a problem; I rocked the boat. I was an outsider and a high performer. I called out this toxic culture and it was most likely why I was let go.

The Competence Threat: Why Accountability Is So Scary

The core issue is that true competence requires accountability, and accountability means everyone – from entry-level staff to C-suite executives – must own their performance. A 2019 study by the Harvard Business Review found that 82% of respondents admitted their leaders have “limited to no” accountability. When competent employees demand accountability, it forces everyone to step up and face their shortcomings, something that can feel deeply uncomfortable for those who’ve been coasting.

For example, when a new employee holds themselves accountable by taking responsibility for outcomes, they implicitly highlight the shortcomings of others. This makes competent employees a target, as they disrupt the unspoken “safe zones” of mediocrity. As a result, organizations with a culture of avoiding accountability often push competent individuals out, using covert tactics like undermining their authority or reputation. For me, it was attacking my integrity, from a company that is allowing an SVP to have multiple complaints against him from female workers for inappropriate behavior but still has him on the integrity committee board… are you serious?

The Subtle Sabotage of Competent Employees

Organizations resistant to accountability often engage in subtle forms of sabotage against competent employees. This can manifest in ways such as:

  1. Undermining Credibility: Competent employees might face questions about their judgment or decisions, even when they have a track record of success. This erodes trust and isolates them from their peers. “High performer, but ruffles feathers”.
  2. Exclusion from Decision-Making: Competent employees may find themselves sidelined in critical conversations or projects, as their input is perceived as a threat to the established ways of working.
  3. Reputation Damage: Some organizations may engage in quiet reputation-smearing campaigns, portraying competent employees as “difficult to work with” or “too demanding” simply because they hold others accountable.

These tactics often lead to frustration, burnout, and the eventual departure of the competent employee. As McKinsey & Company notes, organizations that fail to address issues of accountability and performance lose top talent – those most likely to make positive change and hold others to higher standards.

Closing the Accountability Gap

The question becomes: How can organizations close the accountability gap? It starts with leadership. Leaders must model the behavior they want to see, openly admitting mistakes, holding themselves accountable, and ensuring that the entire team – from top to bottom – follows suit.

Creating a culture of accountability also requires dismantling the structures that protect mediocrity. This involves setting clear performance standards, conducting regular and transparent evaluations, and promoting a culture of feedback and continuous improvement. When accountability is woven into the organizational fabric, competence is no longer feared but embraced.

Final Thoughts

Competence should be a welcomed asset in any organization. However, in environments where mediocrity is the norm, accountability threatens the status quo, and competent employees often bear the brunt of this tension. Closing the accountability gap requires a commitment to cultural change from the top down, where competence is celebrated, and accountability is expected at every level.

For employees who find themselves in organizations resistant to change, the best solution may sometimes be to leave. After all, competence thrives in environments that value growth, responsibility, and, most importantly, accountability.

Organizational Cultural Series

How it started for me…

I had just been let go from my position during a hard time in my personal life. I was angry at first followed immediately by relief. I did not want to stay at the company I had been working for, but I had hoped to find my next opportunity and leave on my own terms. The very next day I saw this post from Denise Conroy on my FYP on TikTok. She was speaking about why some organizations don’t want competent people and embrace mediocrity. Mediocre was the exact word I had used a few weeks earlier to describe the culture of the company I was working at. The legacy employees seemed like a bunch of entitled drones walking around doing the bare minimum but expecting raises and promotions.

👉Follow Denise Conroy wherever you are online.

So, I have all the time in the world to go down a spiral about why an organization would tolerate mediocre employees. Each Sunday in the first three months of 2025, I am going to let you know what I find out. Check back each week for more insights. Here are some of the topics on my list:

  • The Accountability Gap: Why Some Organizations Fear Competence
  • Signs You’re in a Mediocre Workplace (And What to Do About It)
  • How Competence Becomes a Threat in Dysfunctional Cultures
  • The Art of Accountability: Holding Yourself and Others Responsible
  • Surviving the Grind: Staying Sane in a Toxic Workplace

Come back each Sunday for more…

The Role of Chief of Staff for CIOs, CISOs, and CTOs: A Strategic Partnership

In today’s fast-paced technology landscape, the roles of Chief Information Officer (CIO), Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), and Chief Technology Officer (CTO) have evolved into pivotal positions that guide organizations through digital transformation, cybersecurity threats, and technological advancements. However, the demands of these roles can often be overwhelming, leading many executives to employ a Chief of Staff (CoS) to help streamline operations and enhance strategic focus.

What is a Chief of Staff?

A Chief of Staff is a senior member who serves as a trusted advisor and operational leader, managing the day-to-day activities of their principal. This role is particularly valuable in technology-driven environments where the stakes are high, and strategic decision-making is crucial.

Key Responsibilities of a Chief of Staff for CIOs, CISOs, and CTOs

Strategic Planning and Execution: The Chief of Staff collaborates with the executive in developing strategic initiatives aligned with the organization’s goals. For a CIO, this might involve overseeing IT infrastructure improvements, while for a CISO, it could focus on advancing cybersecurity protocols. The CoS ensures that these plans are executed efficiently, tracking progress and outcomes.

Project Management: With technology projects often involving multiple stakeholders, the CoS acts as a project manager, coordinating tasks and deadlines to ensure projects are completed on time and within budget. This is especially important for CIOs and CTOs, who must balance multiple projects simultaneously.

Communication Hub: The CoS serves as a liaison between the executive and various teams across the organization, facilitating communication and collaboration. This role is essential for CISOs, who must engage with various departments to promote cybersecurity awareness and practices.

Stakeholder Engagement: Whether it’s engaging with other executives, board members, or external partners, the Chief of Staff plays a critical role in stakeholder management. They help the CIO, CISO, or CTO articulate their vision, needs, and challenges to gain buy-in and support from key stakeholders.

Operational Efficiency: The CoS identifies inefficiencies within the organization and implements processes to streamline operations. This can involve anything from optimizing team structures to enhancing reporting mechanisms, which can significantly improve productivity in tech departments.

Data Analysis and Reporting: A data-driven approach is essential in technology leadership. The CoS often analyzes key performance indicators (KPIs) and prepares reports for the executive, enabling informed decision-making. For example, a CISO may rely on the CoS to compile data on security incidents and response times to gauge the effectiveness of their cybersecurity strategy.

Talent Development and Team Management: The Chief of Staff may also be involved in identifying talent gaps within the technology teams and advocating for training and development programs. Supporting the recruitment process and mentoring team members can help ensure that the organization has the necessary skills to meet its objectives.

Crisis Management: In the ever-evolving tech landscape, crises can arise unexpectedly. The Chief of Staff assists in crisis management by coordinating response efforts, communicating with stakeholders, and ensuring that the organization can navigate challenges effectively.

What is the difference between a Chief of Staff and an Executive Assistant?

While both the Chief of Staff (CoS) and Executive Assistant (EA) roles provide support to executives, they differ significantly in responsibilities, scope, and strategic impact. Here’s a comparison of the two positions:

Scope of Responsibilities

  • Chief of Staff:
    • Focuses on strategic initiatives and operational management.
    • Manages projects, aligns teams with organizational goals, and serves as a liaison between the executive and other departments.
    • Takes on leadership responsibilities, often overseeing specific functions or teams.
    • Involves high-level problem-solving, decision-making, and long-term planning.
  • Executive Assistant:
    • Primarily provides administrative support to the executive.
    • Manages schedules, handles correspondence, organizes meetings, and maintains files.
    • Focuses on day-to-day operations and logistics, allowing the executive to concentrate on higher-level tasks.
    • Typically does not engage in strategic planning or decision-making.

Strategic vs. Tactical Focus

  • Chief of Staff:
    • Has a strategic focus, often helping shape and implement the organization’s vision and objectives.
    • Involved in cross-departmental initiatives and may lead key projects that affect the organization as a whole.
  • Executive Assistant:
    • Has a tactical focus, ensuring that the executive’s immediate needs are met and that daily operations run smoothly.
    • Provides support that allows the executive to function effectively but is less involved in strategic discussions or planning.

Level of Influence

  • Chief of Staff:
    • Generally has a higher level of influence within the organization, often participating in executive meetings and decision-making processes.
    • Works closely with the executive and other leaders to drive initiatives and improve organizational performance.
  • Executive Assistant:
    • Typically has a more limited influence, primarily focused on the executive’s needs and preferences.
    • While they may provide valuable insights about operational matters, their role is more about supporting the executive than influencing organizational strategy.

Career Path and Skills

  • Chief of Staff:
    • Often a steppingstone to higher leadership roles, such as VP or COO.
    • Requires strong strategic thinking, leadership, project management, and communication skills.
  • Executive Assistant:
    • May lead to administrative or managerial roles but less frequently transitions to senior leadership positions.
    • Requires excellent organizational, time-management, and interpersonal skills.

Nature of the Role

  • Chief of Staff:
    • Considered a strategic partner to the executive, often acting as a right hand in shaping organizational priorities.
    • Involves a broader range of responsibilities beyond traditional administrative tasks.
  • Executive Assistant:
    • Considered more of a support role focused on facilitating the executive’s schedule and managing logistical tasks.
    • While they can be crucial in ensuring the executive’s efficiency, their role is primarily administrative.

While both the Chief of Staff and Executive Assistant play vital roles in supporting executives, the Chief of Staff is more strategically focused and has a broader range of responsibilities that influence organizational success. The Executive Assistant, on the other hand, provides essential administrative support that helps the executive manage their day-to-day activities.

What is the typical tenure for a Chief of Staff?

The typical tenure for a Chief of Staff can vary widely based on several factors, including the organization’s culture, the specific industry, and the individual’s career goals. Generally, the average time someone stays in a Chief of Staff role is around 2 to 4 years.

Here are some factors that can influence this duration:

  • Organizational Dynamics: In fast-paced or rapidly changing industries (like tech), Chiefs of Staff may move on more quickly, either to take on higher roles within the organization or to pursue opportunities elsewhere. Some companies do not support the role of a CoS and see them as an ‘administrative’ position that can be reduced if business decisions need to be made while other companies value the role and would not want to see that level of employee let go so easily.
  • Career Advancement: Many individuals in the Chief of Staff role use it as a steppingstone to higher executive positions, such as VP or even C-suite roles. If they achieve their career goals, they may leave after a few years. Ultimately, while the average tenure is around 2 to 4 years, some may stay longer if they find the role fulfilling and aligned with their career objectives. I have spoken with many CoS that are very happy as ‘number two’ and don’t want to be the executive in charge.
  • Role Satisfaction: The fit between the Chief of Staff and the executive they support, as well as job satisfaction and opportunities for professional growth, can also impact how long someone stays in the position. The CoS is a trusted advisor to their principal. This is a critical connection that can change over time and find the CoS with wanting/needing to find another role.
  • Organizational Changes: Mergers, acquisitions, or significant shifts in company strategy can lead to changes in leadership structures, which may influence tenure in this role. I saw this when the principle let the company and they were not allowed to take any staff with them. The CoS was let go a few weeks later since the new incoming principal either did not want a CoS or they wanted to choose one for themselves. Unless the organization can find a suitable position with the company, the CoS could be out of a job.

Chiefs of Staff often transition into various leadership roles after their tenure, leveraging their experience and insights gained in the position. Some typical roles they may move on to:

  • Vice President (VP) or Senior Vice President (SVP): Many Chiefs of Staff advance to VP or SVP positions within the same department or a related area, where they can oversee larger teams and have a broader impact on the organization.
  • Director of Operations: This role involves overseeing operational processes across the organization, making it a natural fit for those who have experience streamlining operations and enhancing efficiency.
  • Chief Operating Officer (COO): Some Chiefs of Staff may step into a COO role, where they can leverage their operational expertise and strategic insights to drive overall business performance.
  • Chief Technology Officer (CTO) or Chief Information Officer (CIO): If their background is more aligned with technology or information systems, they might transition into a CTO or CIO role, focusing on tech strategy and implementation.
  • Chief Strategy Officer (CSO): This role involves formulating and executing the organization’s long-term strategy, making it a good fit for those with strong strategic planning and analytical skills.
  • General Manager: Chiefs of Staff may take on general management positions within specific business units, where they can apply their cross-functional knowledge and leadership experience.
  • Program or Project Manager: Given their project management experience, some may move into senior program or project management roles, overseeing major initiatives or PMOs within the organization.
  • Consulting Roles: Some Chiefs of Staff may choose to move into consulting, where they can provide strategic insights to various organizations based on their experience.
  • Entrepreneurship: The experience gained as a Chief of Staff can also inspire individuals to start their own businesses or consultancies, using their knowledge to drive innovation and growth.

The versatility of the Chief of Staff role equips individuals with a broad skill set, making them attractive candidates for various leadership positions across organizations.

Who to connect with on LinkedIn: